{short description of image}  
 

RUSSIAN ART AND ARCHITECTURE
THROUGH THE CENTURIES

 
 

Cathedral of St. Dmitrii

 
 

Andrei was succeeded as Grand Duke of Vladimir by his brother, Vsyevolod III, 1176-1212, who, like most other Russian princes, was an enthusiastic patron of the arts and eager to commemorate his name by offering striking churches to the posterity. One of them was the Cathedral of Saint Dmitrii, (guardian of Thessalonika), that he built in Vladimir not far from the Cathedral of the Assumption at the end of the 12th century. The chronicler failed to mention the exact date of its erection. The Cathedral of Saint Dmitrii architecturally repeats the features of the church of the Intercession on Nerl, with the exception that it is more richly decorated. Beneath the central frieze that horizontally divides the facades with the exception of eastern) into two parts are small arcatures. Together with colonnettes they form arcature niches, each one containing carved stone reliefs of birds, lions, or plants, beneath which comes a figure of a saint with halo and under his feet again reliefs of animal and floral design. The corbels that support the colonnettes, their capitals and bases are all richly carved. Among the saints we see princes Boris and Gleb, the first Russians to receive sainthood. Strangely enough these saints are the major part of purely religious motifs, which are otherwise scarcely represented. The tympanums and the drum are covered with carved stone reliefs. Scenes from the Bible, details of apocryphal stories, and all sorts of birds, dogs, panthers, flowers and particularly a great many lions, in all positions and poses, decorate the tympanums. We see there in the central tympanum, Alexander the Great in a chariot drawn by griffins and ascending to heaven, and above the left window of the northern wall even Vsyevolod with his sons, a place not very prominent for the benefactor. We are surprised by the number of figures and by the disorder that reigns in this semi-sacred, floral and animal world. Nevertheless the impression is great and one cannot but share the excitement of a West European priest who after seeing the cathedral, is alleged to have exclaimed: "O Lord, what a divine heresy!"

Through the centuries the old reliefs deteriorated and had eventually to be replaced; at present not all date from the 12th century. The cathedral was repeatedly pillaged and damaged by fire, each time having to be restored, and losing a part of it's original body. Soviet critics decry the restoration of 1837-1839, presumably done by order of Nicholas I, when the belfry, the galleries and the two chapels were pulled down. The cathedral was originally built as a separate unit, the annexes being added later, with the exception of the staircase tower, which leads to the inside gallery reserved for the prince and dignitaries. With the removal of the outbuildings the cathedral gained in elegance by fully exposing the beauty and richness of its reliefs.

There is no information to tell us who were these ingenious architects and stone carvers who built and so wonderfully decorated the old churches of Vladimir. Their sumptuous lines, the originality of the slopes of their roofs and especially their gorgeous carved stone ornamentation made them different from other Russian churches of the same period or before it. Until not long ago the prevailing opinion, borrowed from the old chronicles, was that "Many masters from all over the world" participated in the construction and decoration of the old churches of Vladimir. Indeed, they show influences of Byzantium and Georgia and to a lesser degree of Armenian, Serbian and Romanesque architecture and decorative art. Some details are almost identical to those found in Georgian and Serbian churches, the others could be traced to the Near East and to Asia. Cultural and trade relations between the Kievan state and Georgia existed before the 12th century, and we know that the Georgians participated in the building of the cathedral in Chernigov. These relations expanded during the reign of Andrei and Vsyevolod, and it would be logical to assume that among the "Many masters. . . " were Georgians too. The Georgians were exposed in their turn to Oriental and primarily to Persian influences for centuries which they could then have carried to Vladimir. Oriental contributions to Russian arts came from friendly peoples and were not imposed by invaders. Mongols brought very little if anything in this field.

The results of large scale archeological excavations undertaken in the Soviet Union after the Second World War persuaded a number of Soviet scholars to return to the question, of who built the old churches in Vladimir. They now accept the probability that Russian masters were involved in Vladimir; in the absence of precise documentation, both opinions are easily defended. Of course there is a possibility that Russians, as well as Georgians, Serbians and others could have modified as early as the 12th century or even earlier the architectural features that they had inherited from Byzantium as well as adding certain elements and embellishments of their own. Some 11th century carved objects excavated in Novgorod have reliefs that greatly resemble those of the cathedral of Saint Dmitrii and the assumption is that Novgorodians had carved them. Consequently, the possibility exists that the same masters or their pupils could have participated in the construction of Vladimir's churches. But even more persuasive is the fact that generations of Russian wood-carvers, including simple peasants, handled wood with extraordinary skill and imagination and produced rich and typically Russian motifs. There is no doubt that they could have repeated the same feats in stone. The standards reached by Russian architecture at the end of the 12th and the beginning of the 13th century were not inferior to most contemporary West European accomplishments. This was the result of a period of frantic construction, whose importance can be measured by the fact that in 1185 the small town of Vladimir lost 32 churches in a fire and there were more that survived, so many had been built in a relatively short period of time. The innovations that builders introduced there have become known in Russia as Vladimir-Suzdal architecture.

There is no doubt that Greek painters covered the old churches of Vladimir with frescoes soon after they were built. Most probably here too the Greeks were assisted by their Russian pupils. Unfortunately the old frescoes were often victims of fires, Tatar vandalism or simple lack of skill on the part of those who later wanted to restore them. For the same reasons the 12th century frescoes in the cathedral of Saint Dmitrii did not survive. When the cathedral was redecorated in 1844, some fragments of the old frescoes were discovered for the first time, but they attracted no special attention. At that time old frescoes were thought of no differently from any other curio. In 1918-1919 the best preserved western wall under the gallery was cleaned, setting free the fragments of the large composition of the Last Judgement. We see here the apostles and behind them the angels. To the left is Saint Peter leading the righteous, escorted by a flourish of trumpets played by the angels, and then paradise itself with the Virgin and the forefathers in it. By carefully examining the frescoes, two styles may be discerned: The more ascetic, visible in the faces of the apostles and most probably painted by the Greeks, and the softer and almost poetic style of the righteous, presumably painted by the Russians in the 14th century. The interest in frescoes lasted only a short time and as part of anti-religious policy of the Soviet government, the cathedral was emptied of everything, closed and left to ruin. Only in the nineteen-sixties did Soviet restorers return to clean some more fragments and to retouch those where the original colors had become almost invisible. The rest of the cathedral was whitewashed. In several churches including the cathedral of Saint Dmitrii, I have seen myself the restoration process under way. Would it be better if the restorers had just cleaned the frescoes and left them as they are instead of retouching some parts? The cupola of Saint Dmitrii Cathedral has preserved to the present day its Byzantine, helmet-like shape. Its top is crowned with an old open-work gilded copper cross, which has a dove vane on its top and a crescent at the bottom, symbolizing the invincibility of the Orthodox faith and the victory of Christianity over Islam. It appears that the crescent was on the top of the cross during the Tatar occupation of Russia.

 
 

GO BACK
NEXT

 

Return to Xenophon. Return to Ruscity. Return to Rushistory. Return to Ukraine.